Live Steam player count comparison, updated every 10 minutes. Both are Free To Play games.
eFootball™ is currently the more played game: 10,078 concurrent players on Steam right now vs 9,729 for Where Winds Meet — a similar number of players. Across all tracked metrics, eFootball™ leads 6 of 8.
Coilr tracks charts like this for every game — and playtime history for your own library.
| Metric | eFootball™ | Where Winds Meet |
|---|---|---|
| Players right now | 10,078 | 9,729 |
| 24-hour peak | 25,875 | 23,045 |
| 7-day average | 17,520 | 12,689 |
| 30-day average | 16,866 | 14,085 |
| 30-day trend | ±0% | −17% |
| Peak (tracked) | 32,935 | 33,572 |
| Steam reviews | 51% positive | 87% positive |
| Total reviews | 112,491 | 111,796 |
| Owners (SteamSpy est.) | ~10,000,000 | — |
| Price | Free to play | Free to play |
Full stats: eFootball™ · Where Winds Meet · add more games to this comparison →
| Month | eFootball™ | Where Winds Meet | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg | Peak | Avg | Peak | |
| May 2026 | 17,380 | 23,710 | 20,207 | 33,572 |
| Jun 2026 | 16,745 | 32,935 | 15,254 | 31,557 |
| Jul 2026 (so far) | 16,975 | 27,162 | 13,121 | 25,223 |
Monthly average and peak concurrent players on Steam, from Coilr's own tracking (10-minute polls, hourly beyond 30 days).
eFootball™ currently has more players: 10,078 concurrent players on Steam vs 9,729 for Where Winds Meet — a similar number of players.
Over the last 30 days eFootball™ averaged 16,866 concurrent players and Where Winds Meet averaged 14,085. By that measure eFootball™ is currently the bigger game.
eFootball™ averaged 16,866 concurrent players over the last 30 days, roughly flat vs the previous 30 days. Its highest tracked player count is 32,935.
Where Winds Meet averaged 14,085 concurrent players over the last 30 days, down 17% vs the previous 30 days. Its highest tracked player count is 33,572.