Live Steam player count comparison, updated every 10 minutes.
Crusader Kings III is currently the more played game: 27,546 concurrent players on Steam right now vs 4,038 for FOR HONOR™, about 7× more players. Crusader Kings III has been ahead for 77 days straight. Crusader Kings III also has the better Steam reviews: 90% positive vs 69%. Crusader Kings III is currently 70% off on Steam. Across all tracked metrics, Crusader Kings III leads 7 of 10.
These are Steam players only. A game that also runs on its own launcher, a storefront of its own or on console has players this number cannot see, so read it as a comparison of Steam audiences rather than of total ones.
Coilr members average 73.4h in Crusader Kings III and 20.2h in FOR HONOR™. Connect your Steam account and this row fills in with your own hours instead — then keeps tracking both, so you can see which one you are actually still playing.

Crusader Kings III
73.4h
average of 27 members

FOR HONOR™
20.2h
average of 26 members
Free · read-only via Steam OpenID · no password · delete anytime
Tracked by Coilr since April 2026 · Steam polled every 10 minutes · methodology
Crusader Kings III has had the higher daily player count for the last 77 days, every day since Coilr began tracking both games.
Days tracked
77
Current streak
77 days
Crusader Kings III
Lead changes
0
Closest gap
77%
Jul 30, 2026
How this works: each game's daily average concurrent players (from Coilr's 10-minute Steam polls), compared on the 77 days where both games have data. Whichever averages higher leads that day. methodology
| Metric | Crusader Kings III | FOR HONOR™ |
|---|---|---|
| Players right now | 27,546 | 4,038 |
| 24-hour peak | 31,485 | 4,677 |
| 7-day average | 22,158 | 3,189 |
| 30-day average | 20,619 | 3,695 |
| 30-day trend | +7% | +17% |
| Peak (tracked) | 33,017 | 7,261 |
| Steam reviews | 90% positive | 69% positive |
| Recent reviews (3 mo) | 86% positive | 62% positive |
| Total reviews | 142,853 | 163,725 |
| Owners (SteamSpy est.) | ~2,000,000 | ~5,000,000 |
| Release date | Sep 1, 2020 | Feb 13, 2017 |
| Price | $14.99 (−70%) | $29.99 |
Full stats: Crusader Kings III · FOR HONOR™ · add more games to this comparison →
| Month | Crusader Kings III | FOR HONOR™ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg | Peak | Avg | Peak | |
| Apr 2026 | — | — | 4,051 | 4,991 |
| May 2026 | 18,238 | 25,816 | 3,830 | 4,422 |
| Jun 2026 | 16,745 | 27,303 | 3,074 | 5,078 |
| Jul 2026 | 19,496 | 29,977 | 3,390 | 7,261 |
| Aug 2026 (so far) | 20,842 | 33,017 | 3,530 | 5,835 |
Monthly average and peak concurrent players on Steam, from Coilr's own tracking (10-minute polls, hourly beyond 30 days).
Crusader Kings III currently has more players: 27,546 concurrent players on Steam vs 4,038 for FOR HONOR™, about 7× more players.
Over the last 30 days Crusader Kings III averaged 20,619 concurrent players and FOR HONOR™ averaged 3,695. By that measure Crusader Kings III is currently the bigger game.
Not in Coilr's head-to-head tracking: Crusader Kings III has had the higher daily average concurrent player count on Steam on every one of the 77 days both games have been tracked.
By Steam review score, Crusader Kings III rates higher: 90% positive across 142,853 reviews vs 69% across 163,725 for FOR HONOR™. Crusader Kings III has the larger player base right now (27,546 vs 4,038 concurrent). Player counts, ratings, price and trend are compared side by side above.
Crusader Kings III averaged 20,619 concurrent players over the last 30 days, up 7% vs the previous 30 days. Its highest tracked player count is 33,017.
FOR HONOR™ averaged 3,695 concurrent players over the last 30 days, up 17% vs the previous 30 days. Its highest tracked player count is 7,261.